The discussion over the past 48 hours over the resignation
of an RT anchor is misplaced. Sure, a face at the US based television network
owned by the Russian government publicly resigned over Russian policy in the
Ukraine.
Good for Liz Wahl. And good for her fellow anchor Abby
Martin to condemn Russian actions in Crimea.
They are certainly entitled to their opinion.
At long as it doesn’t affect their work. And in these
instances, it has.
Simply put, opinion has no place in reporting.
If you have an opinion, share it. Off air.
What is fascinating is the surprising support on ethical
grounds shown towards the two American journalists who made what they say are
individual decisions over what, ultimately, is a difference of opinion with
corporate policy.
Anyone in American television working for a news
organization works for a corporation. Whether that’s the Corporation for Public
Broadcasting over at PBS, News Corp for FOX News Channel, or Disney for ABC
News.
And it’s virtually impossible for anyone to agree completely
with the decisions of a corporate overlord. You can pick your examples, but you
know the result.
Should Disney bend to the interests of the Chinese government
when seeking to sell and promote a film across that populous nation. Should NBC
News self promote entertainment coverage of sporting events, or even late night
talk shows, on their primary news programs.
The answer to each is pretty clear, even though we have seen
each come to bear in recent years. Some repeatedly.
But no one resigned in protest, let alone resigned in
protest on air, over these corporate decisions.
What’s different here is that RT is owned by a government,
not a publicly traded US based corporation. And that distinction matters. And
it also places RT, along with France24, Deutsche Welle, Al Jazeera America,
CCTV, and the myriad of other foreign government owned channels, in their own
category. They are arms of the governments that own them, no different than the
US owned Al Hurra, or even the Voice of America.
Each is a visible manifestation of the soft diplomacy that
each nation presses in our age of constant and dueling media.
Any journalist working for these networks, in any capacity,
should recognize this going in. For someone to act as Ms. Wahl has trivializes
her, the independence of journalists, and the trust, as limited as it may be,
that the public has in all of those who deliver the news on air.
I don’t say this out of spite, or any animus. I don’t know
Ms. Wahl. I had not heard of Abby Martin before this week. And, yes, some of my
best friends in the business work for some of these organizations.
Journalism jobs are hard to come by. Good people often leave
the three alphabet networks, and the cable universe. But if you want to hitch
your wagon to a government run train, you better be prepared for those wheels
to come off at some point. Skidding along a railway sure leaves a nasty burn,
not to mention the splinters.
Lauding someone for a self-inflicted wound sure seems to
miss the point.
A personal note: I was
recruited by one of the foreign owned networks, CCTV, to talk with them about heading
up one of their primary US programs. Let’s just say the conversation took a
decidedly sharp turn after I questioned how a story on religion would be
covered by CCTV, let alone whether they would consider a series on the role of
religion in America. And I remain pleased with the fact that I raised this in
an interview, which included the American emissary for CCTV, someone who has
also not communicated with me in any form since that meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment